Carlton Fredericks, well-known nutritionist, was written up by a non-medical author in a very June 1962 issue of a well-known magazine with wide national circulation. 25th Edition for Men may be a fluid, aromatic fougére fragrance with a sensuous masculine mix of fruity, herbaceous and woody notes that are forever recent and forever lasting. He was accused of constructing “false” statements like that vitamins might facilitate club feet, frigidity and tooth decay. It’s accepted in well-informed nutritional circles that in all probability most congenital deformities will be the result of dietary deficiencies in the mother, that poor nutrition will affect the feeling of well-being and also the sex urge and it is fully elementary and common data that dental caries is the result of improper diet. Men will love the contemporary, clean feel of Gentlemen Pride, and girls will love its unique, masculine fragrance! Thus Fredericks was right and also the “specialists” were wrong once again. But the unfortunate issue is that the person with the new concepts is usually placed on the defensive. He must satisfy the opposition that he is right with some sort of proof, but they never are required to back up their opinions with any scientific evidence.
Perhaps we want a decision to arms. Nutritionists arise. Throw off the shackles of presidency restraint and medical indif-ference. Stop being on the defensive and mount a robust offensive. We have a tendency to have more than enough surveys, statistics, stu-dies, reports and info to prove our position. The time has come back to form them prove theirs. Thus let us demand that the opposition demonstrate and justify their notions with cold, scientific facts that food supplements are unnecessary, that we are therefore healthy and that vitamins don’t seem to be helpful therapeutically.